The Select Board’s failure to implement Article 24 defies the explicit desires of Weston voters and democratic process. Lise Revers, our recently elected Select Board member, heard repeatedly from residents about this issue during her campaign and promised to push it forward. She began her tenure by requesting a discussion at her first Select Board meeting on  May 14th and addressed the issue directly, but remains in the minority.

We are being asked to authorize the Select Board to sell a small parcel of land near the Weston Transfer Station and Kendall Green train stop, which the Town acquired many years ago and has recently been leasing to Granite Brook Materials. The parcel was until now administratively unimportant, but with the State’s newly enacted 3A rezoning mandates, it becomes critical piece of how to manage this state-mandated development nightmare.

Rather than sell this land and significantly weaken our control over potential future development of nearly ten acres of surrounding land, we should hold onto the land as long as we need to explore our 3A rezoning options.

In this upcoming election, Weston is fortunate to have the opportunity to choose between two candidates, Lise Revers & Chris DeBenedetto, to fill a single pending vacancy on the Select Board.  

The Select Board is comprised of three elected members. It is the Town’s executive body and primary policy-making entity affecting service delivery, financial health, development, and oversight of Town’s administrative departments. Decisions made by Select Board directly affect the quality of life in Weston. 

We are opposed to additional funding for the design and engineering of a shared use bicycle path along Route 30 as described in Article 17.

At the May 2018 Town Meeting voters authorized approximately $1 million in design fees for a Route 30 roadway improvement project that included a 5-foot sidewalk. Six years later, Weston has been presented with a project that bears little resemblance to what was described to and approved by voters.

Attend the Weston Annual Town Meeting
7:00 pm Monday, May 8, Weston High School Auditorium

Important issues will be voted at Weston’s Annual Town Meeting on Monday, determining the size of our property taxes in the coming year, how Weston property owners can develop their properties, the availability and cost of our drinking water, and priorities for Community Preservation spending. Usually only 3-5% of residents attend, so a few voters make big decisions for all of us. YOU can make a big difference. Please familiarize yourself with the Warrant Articles, attend, and cast your vote.

A couple days ago, Focus on Weston published an article where we reviewed the Community Preservation Act (CPA for the Act, versus the CPC for the Committee), its implementation in Weston, the projects completed to date, and their financial implications. We continue today with the arguments for and against the CPC proposals to spend $1.9 million for new pickleball and tennis courts, and design funds for an ultimately $375,000 Case Estates Rhododendron Garden. We urge you to attend the Annual Town Meeting on May 8th, and to VOTE NO on these CPC proposals (Articles 19 and 20).

The Weston Finance Committee recently voted to oppose the Community Preservation Committee’s (CPC’s) proposals to spend $1.9 million for new pickleball and tennis courts, and design funds for an ultimately $375,000 Case Estates Rhododendron Garden. At the Annual Town Meeting on May 8th, the Fincom will explain their rationale, that the CPC does not have an overall plan and priorities for future projects, so it seems imprudent to commit these significant sums for expensive, nice-to-have ideas without an overall Community Preservation plan. There is also at least some feeling that these two specific projects are very expensive and fundamentally misguided ways to spend taxpayer money, even if it has already been collected from taxpayers.

We concur with the Fincom’s assessment, and urge you to attend the Town Meeting, and to VOTE NO on these two CPC proposals (Articles 19 and 20). To understand why, it is useful to review the Community Preservation Act (CPA), its implementation in Weston, and the arguments for and against these specific proposals. 

We all benefitted from the discussion on Water Management at the March 28 meeting of the Select Board. Based upon a recommendation from Laurie Bent , the Select Board decided to withdraw two planned Warrant Articles related to our Water Management challenges. The first of those would have authorized $26.2 million for the replacement of two water storage tanks, plus additional remedial work related to water sourcing and distribution, including the Pumping Station at Wellesley Street, our only source of water from the Massachusetts Regional Water Authority (MWRA). The second Warrant Article would have changed our zoning bylaw to enable the Select Board to govern the height of related new structures, pre-empting the Planning Board and the interests of the resident abutters who would be affected by any new structures.

While Weston has a number of sources of funding other than Property Taxes, the quarterly real estate tax payments we make to “Town of Weston” cover around 90% of the Town’s operating budget and debt service. State Aid, such as State-funded reimbursement for certain aspects of Special Education, State contributions toward METCO bussing expenses, the State’s various transportation grants, plus many other small grants and reimbursements make up about half of the remainder. And most of the rest is funded by the Excise Taxes we all pay annually on our automobiles and other significant personal property.

None of that is free money, not even the State grants…

Sometimes we see things that we wish weren’t true. Sometimes we ignore facts that get in the way of whatever we have imagined or the outcomes we have expected. Sometimes we put our heads in the sand when we don’t want to address the challenges that are happening around us.  The truth can be inconvenient.

Governing a town like Weston is hard work. Even our small town has a $100 million budget and faces many complex management challenges. 

What do trees and trust have in common? Weston taxpayers invested $19 million in the Town Center Improvement Project, but the contractors mishandled the tree planting and our Town leaders – entrusted with managing this important project – have failed to hold the contractors accountable and get the problems corrected.

There was a post this week on the Weston Community group Facebook page regarding the teacher contract negotiations that must be addressed with facts to straighten out the situation for Weston residents and support the School Committee as it strives to secure a reasonable contract renewal.

The chart was posted on behalf of the Weston Education Association (the local teachers’ union), summarizing the terms they are seeking in the current contract negotiations, including base salary increases of 17.25% over three years.

Residents should not have to settle for the consequences of too little attention to financial management by the Select Board, the School Committee and the Finance Committee. Weston property taxes are far higher than neighboring comparable towns – whether measured by the average or median household, or per capita – as are Weston’s levels of debt and unfunded liabilities. Our per-pupil expenditures are now about 30% higher than in similar districts, despite school performance that is roughly in line. These tax and financial burdens contribute to our underperforming real estate value appreciation compared to those same towns.

At the May 2018 Town Meeting voters approved Article 17, which authorized approximately $1 million in design fees for a Route 30 roadway improvement project that included a 5-foot sidewalk. Four years later, Weston has been presented with a project that bears little resemblance to what was described to and approved by voters.

At the May 2022 Town Meeting, residents overwhelmingly approved Article 24, a petition to increase the size of the Select Board from three to five members. The Select Board had opposed this Article, and instead spoke in favor of Article 23, which sought authorization to fund a consulting study on the size and structure of Town government generally. The residents’ vote, however, was compelling – 72% voted in favor of expanding the size of the Board and 82% voted against the proposed consulting study. Nevertheless, this week the Select Board confirmed their intentional delay and questionable future support of Article 24 to increase the size of the Board, and are instead moving ahead with their broader Town government study.